Search

Power users on Windows will be very well acquainted with the Task Manager. This is the utility that can tell you how hard your CPU is working, what it’s working on, what your memory usage is, or even how much network traffic your computer is currently using. But did you know that it has a “no titlebar” view?

If you want to leave your Task Manager showing on your desktop for a period of time, it can be nice to hide the title bar and gain that space for displaying more information. To do this, simply double-click on the empty area to the right of the tabs. Once it has switched views, you can switch back quickly by double-clicking anywhere on the border.

One bonus tip: If you’re new to the Task Manager, you may not know that you can set it to minimize down to your system tray area. This is a really nice way to keep an eye on how hard your CPU is working at any time. Simply open Task Manager (Start > Run > type “taskman” and press Enter), and in the Options menu, check “Hide when minimized”. Now when you minimize it, the Task Manager will show as a tiny bar graph in your system tray near your system time.

“Performance tip” is the easiest way to describe this link, but the truth is that it’s really a way to avoid an ugly problem in Windows Vista. It turns out that if you’re a power user, and tend to have a lot of windows open on your desktop, you could very well run into what appears to be a flaw in Vista’s memory handling when it comes to the “desktop heap”. If you have no idea what that means, don’t worry. We’re not sure exactly what it means either. The gist of it is that Windows has a certain amount of memory set aside for handling open windows, and by default it may simply not be enough. If you run up against this issue, you may experience one of the following problems when attempting to start a new program:

• You get a strange “out of memory” message, despite the fact that you’re using only a fraction of the RAM installed on your system.
• The window opens but its contents refuse to load.
• The window opens, but menus are missing, dialog boxes are empty, or buttons don’t work.

Luckily Ed Bott has some great instructions on how to go about working around the problem.

The fix involves editing your registry which isn’t for the faint of heart. But honestly, we’ve done this sort of thing a million times, and it’s nothing to be afraid of. If you’re experiencing this kind of slow-down in Vista, it’s probably worth the risk.

Todd Haselton at Ars Technica’s 1 Microsoft Way journal is reporting that the majority of Support.com’s customers are confused by some of Vista’s significant new changes. After opening their doors for service in June, a tally of that month’s support calls revealed that a whopping 77 percent were to get help with Vista, with a surprising 30 percent of those calls simply asking for help on how to navigate Vista’s controversial new Aero interface.

Considering that Support.com is a commercial service, we’re going to agree with 1 Microsoft Way that their greater constituency is probably more on the newbie side than your typical Flash drive-slinging, Google-searching computer nut. That said, Support.com’s report of confusion among the mainstream ranks can be taken in a number of ways, depending on whether you’re a fan of the significant changes - some arguably for the sake of change alone - that Microsoft made with Vista. The findings become even more significant when you consider the fact that Windows users - people who have already been using the product for months, years or perhaps decades - are getting lost when they sit down and try to navigate through the new translucent black jungle Microsoft introduced.

Still, Support.com is but a drop in the bucket of the mainstream Vista reaction, so it would be interesting to see support request results from larger players like Dell and Best Buy’s Geek Squad for a much larger gulp of the big picture.

Yahoo! Search will soon be open to 3rd party development, and the expected results look very useful.

Yahoo! Search’s new open platform will give site owners much greater control over what is presented when their page shows up in Yahoo! Search results. Instead of a simple title and an abstract URL, they can present ratings, reviews, images, etc… to display right in the results.

This will have a mutually beneficial effect for users and site owners: users don’t have to waste unnecessary clicks on a link that might not have the information they’re looking for, and the website owners get more focused, quality traffic.

First responses to the proposed changes are for the most part favorable, though a lot of users are wondering how Yahoo! will keep this system from being abused, i.e. become another tool for those nefarious, moustache-twisting spammers. There’s no word back from Yahoo! on that front.

Yahoo! has yet to implement the new open Search, but their sneak preview is enough to whet our appetites. Kudos to Yahoo! for continuing to move forward in the highly competitive world of online search.

Amazon has launched a trial of a new program called Product Ads. The program allows retailers to purchase ad space on Amazon without selling their products on the site. When a user clicks on the ad rather than being taken to a product within Amazon, the customer will instead be sent to the companies 3rd party site to make a purchase.

Product Ads will show a 3rd party competitor, along with the price they’re offering an item at right on the same page as the Amazon item. Reminiscent of PriceGrabber, different sites and their price for a particular item are listed below the item and description on Amazon. Users can see all the prices at the same time and make a decision whether to continue with their purchase on Amazon, or click over to the 3rd party website to make a purchase.

Much like other advertising programs advertisers only pay for their ad when a user clicks on an ad and is taken to the advertisers site. Both Google Product Search and Shopping.com run similar programs, but neither is the selling powerhouse that Amazon is. By combining advertising along with their extensive product catalog Amazon is setting themselves up to be even more of a leader in the online shopping arena.

The new program also forces Amazon to stay extremely competitive in its pricing in order to make users want to purchase items from them, however it also gives them the ability to make money off users who do choose to shop somewhere else. It will be interesting to see if the program survives. No doubt the program is great for shoppers, but how do you think Amazon will do with Product Ads? Do you think it will make it through the trial?

[via VentureBeat]

Google News is working hard to either kill your local newspaper or make you read it more often. While Google News has typically gathered the top stories from news sources across the web and presented the top world and national stories, you can now get local pages for pretty much any major city.

All you have to do is visit the Google News homepage, scroll down the page a bit until you see a box asking for a city, state, or zip code. Fill in the box, and Google will add a local section to the page. You can also click the hyperlink to get a standalone page. For example, this link takes you to a Google News for Chicago.

There’s no real local search tool yet. If you enter a search term from a local news page, you still get global search results.

[via Google Blogoscoped]

The year of 2007 is coming to an end, and so, it seems, is Microsoft’s attempt to regain some ground in the hotly contested search market.

According to the data, Microsoft has two main troubles: getting people to use Live Search, and converting people to using Live Search as their main search portal. Translation: they ain’t doing so good.

The latest statistics published by Nielsen Online give Live Search and MSN a share of just 12.0% of all the searches on the U.S. market in November, compared to 13.8% in October. Those numbers pale when put next to Google, who recorded less queries in November but still increased its market share to 57.7%.

So why the disparity? Simple: the name. You can easily tell someone in a casual conversation to “Google” it, but telling someone to “Live Search” it is just so not cool (okay, okay, it’s not the name; we simply didn’t want to elucidate on the myriad factors behind the philosophy and practice of web searches, and were looking to save some time).

Have you ever lost your massive email database to a hard drive crash, inadvertent deletion, program failure, or monsoonal winds? Go on, it’s okay to admit it; we’re all friends here. Well now there’s no need to let the failures of the past haunt you; now there’s MailStore Home.

MailStore Home is a wonderful solution for people who have a need to backup their emails in a straightforward and simple fashion (read: everybody). Best of all, it’s free. As in 100% free. It works with all POP3 and IMAP accounts (as in Gmail), as well as Thunderbird, Outlook, Exchange Server, Windows Mail, and many others.

MailStore Home offers a simple three step process for backing up your email accounts. Once you’ve downloaded and installed the free program (12 MB), open it up, click on import, enter the settings for your particular account, and double-click your newly created email profile. Wham! It’s done. But unlike the 80’s band of that same name, it won’t wake you up before you go-go.

Once the backup is created, you can leave it in MailStore, export it to .eml, or burn it to a CD or DVD. Or, like me, you can lean back in your chair, lock your hands behind your head, and feel pretty good about yourself for backing up what really are your most important files (regardless of that picture of you and the Prime Minister of Malaysia).

[Via Cybernet]

How much data do you think Google has about you and your browsing habits? Crazy amounts. Scary amounts. Volumes of data that make our veins run cold and keep us awake at night. But, hey, they kinda own the web, right? So what can you do?

Forty One of the most popular 100 sites on the web use Google to track their visitors. As it turns out, it’s pretty simple to opt-out of Google Analytics data collection. Blog Boing shows us how, “For the more privacy cautious between us the solution for preventing any site’s Google Analytics to record any information on us is quite simple. Just add to your hosts file the following lines:”

127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.com
127.0.0.1 google-analytics.com
127.0.0.1 ssl.google-analytics.com
127.0.0.1 *.google-analytics.com

This little “hack” keeps your computer from contacting Google’s Analytics data collection servers, thus keeping your data out of Google’s incredibly wealthy hands.

Thanks BlogBoing!

If we were Jimmy Wales, we’d have bought a bullet proof vest long ago. Google has just set Jimmy up the bomb; Announcing ‘Knol’, a human powered index of knowledge which seeks to rival Wikipedia in accountability, and thus accuracy.

Knol will focus on credit for authors who “own” pages within the system. Write a bad page, lose your reputation. Write a better page than one which currently exists, and knock it out of the top spot. It’s free market dynamics and modern credit reporting all rolled into one and applied to encyclopedia style information. Google, for it’s part, seemingly intends to be hands off in the management of Knol, foregoing any oversight structure similar to that in place at Wikipedia or Mahalo.

While we find this all super interesting, we’re going to stop short of prognosticating about the death of Wikipedia. Other industry pundits are calling it “a game changer” and “huge”; We’ve decided to wait until Monday to predict Wikipedia’s imminent death. It’s called journalism, look it up.

Oddly enough, there is no current Wikipedia entry for “Knol”. Maybe we should pitch in and create one?

[via Paris Lemon]